Simon Woods makes a very convincing statistical case here https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.02090 that case numbers were declining prior to the lockdown in the UK. The most baffling aspect of this is why there was no evidence of a gradual ramp up of mortality prior to the lockdown. The spatial pattern is even harder to explain. Why did lockdown not stop the spatial spread?. To illustrate the fact that the lockdown very clearly did not I have plotted (using polygons with size proportional to the population to show the local authorities) the time to the first death reported from each LA in England. By the fourth week of lockdown every single local authority had reported at least one covid death. However travel restrictions were in place. This suggests that the virus was already present throughout the whole country prior to lockdown. Would imposing lockdowns just a week earlier have changed anything at all?